Treatment-Seeking Behavior Among Women of Childbearing Age with Infertility Attending Amuwo Odofin Gyne Clinic
Chapter One
Objective of the Study
The primary objectives of this study are as follows:
- To examine the factors that influence treatment-seeking behaviour among women of childbearing age with infertility in Amuwo Odofin.
- To assess the impact of socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, and social support on the choice of treatment for infertility.
- To identify the barriers women face in accessing gynaecological and fertility-related healthcare services at the Amuwo Odofin Gynecology Clinic.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Preamble
This chapter presents a literature review focusing on infertility and treatment-seeking behaviours among women in Amuwo Odofin, Lagos State. It comprises four key sections: Conceptual Review, which defines and explores the social implications of infertility; Theoretical Framework, outlining relevant theories and their applicability; Empirical Reviews, evaluating existing studies to identify trends and gaps; and Gap in the Literature, highlighting areas needing further research. This chapter aims to establish a comprehensive understanding of infertility’s complexities, setting the stage for effective interventions and policies to support women navigating infertility challenges in Nigeria.
Conceptual Literature Review
Definition of Infertility
Infertility is broadly defined as the inability to achieve a successful pregnancy after 12 months of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse. It is a significant public health issue that affects individuals and couples worldwide, transcending cultural, social, and economic boundaries (Chiware et al., 2021). The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes infertility as a complex disorder of the reproductive system, which may result from a variety of factors affecting either the male or female partner. The complexity of infertility is reflected in its various types, causes, and prevalence rates, which are essential for understanding its impact on individuals and families.
There are primarily two types of infertility: primary and secondary. Primary infertility refers to individuals or couples who have never achieved a pregnancy after a year of trying, whereas secondary infertility occurs when a couple has been able to conceive at least once but is now unable to do so again (Mahey et al., 2018). Both types have distinct emotional and psychological implications, often exacerbated by societal pressures and expectations surrounding childbearing. In Nigeria, the stigma associated with infertility can significantly affect the mental health of women, as childbearing is often linked to their identity and societal status (Tabong & Adongo, 2023).
The causes of infertility are multifaceted and can be categorized into several factors, including physiological, environmental, and lifestyle-related issues. Physiological factors may include ovulatory disorders, endometriosis, or anatomical abnormalities in the reproductive organs (Lampic et al., 2021). Environmental factors, such as exposure to pollutants and chemicals, can also affect fertility in both men and women. Additionally, lifestyle choices, including smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, and obesity, can contribute to fertility issues. Understanding these diverse causes is critical for healthcare providers in designing effective treatment and intervention strategies for couples facing infertility.
The prevalence of infertility varies significantly across regions and cultures, influenced by factors such as health care access, cultural beliefs, and socioeconomic status. In Nigeria, studies indicate that infertility affects approximately 20-30% of couples, with women often bearing the brunt of cultural blame (Ombelet et al., 2017). This prevalence is particularly concerning in rural areas, where traditional beliefs surrounding fertility may overshadow modern medical practices. For instance, a study by Guntupalli and Chenchelgudem (2022) highlights how women in the Chenchu tribe face unique challenges due to cultural expectations regarding childbearing, affecting their treatment-seeking behaviours.
In low- and middle-income countries, the burden of infertility is compounded by limited access to healthcare services, which often results in untreated or mismanaged reproductive health issues. According to Chauhan et al. (2018), many women in India rely on traditional healers for infertility treatments before seeking medical intervention, illustrating the influence of cultural beliefs on treatment-seeking behaviour. This reliance on traditional methods can lead to delayed diagnoses and interventions, exacerbating the emotional and psychological toll of infertility.
Social stigma plays a significant role in shaping the experiences of individuals dealing with infertility. Women, in particular, often face heightened scrutiny and criticism from their communities, as fertility is closely linked to their social standing and identity (Chethana & Shilpa, 2020). In many African cultures, the inability to conceive can lead to marginalization and isolation, affecting women’s mental health and overall well-being. This stigma can also hinder women from accessing available medical resources, as they may fear judgment from their peers and community members.
Management of Infertility in the Public Sector
The management of infertility in the public sector is a multifaceted endeavor that encompasses healthcare systems, government policies, and support initiatives aimed at addressing the complex needs of individuals and couples facing infertility challenges. Effective management requires a collaborative approach that integrates medical interventions, policy frameworks, and community support systems to improve access to fertility treatments and enhance the overall reproductive health landscape.
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
Preamble
This chapter outlines the research methodology adopted for this study on the treatment-seeking behaviour of women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin. It begins with a description of the research design, followed by the setting of the study and the characteristics of the target population. The chapter then details the sampling procedure and sample size, the instruments for data collection, and the steps taken to ensure data validity and reliability. Additionally, it discusses the pilot study conducted prior to the main data collection, the methods employed for data collection and analysis, and the ethical considerations adhered to throughout the research process. This comprehensive approach provides a clear framework for understanding the methodology employed in this study.
Research Design
The research design for this study is based on a quantitative survey methodology, which serves as a blueprint to guide the investigation. This design was selected due to its capacity to gather numerical data that can be analyzed statistically, allowing for the identification of trends and patterns in treatment-seeking behaviour among women with infertility. Quantitative research is particularly useful for this study as it enables the collection of data from a large sample, facilitating generalizations about the population in Amuwo Odofin (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). By employing this design, the research aims to elucidate the various factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour, including socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, and barriers to accessing healthcare services.
Setting for the Study
The study is set in Amuwo Odofin, a local government area located in Lagos State, Nigeria. This area is characterized by a diverse population with varying socio-economic backgrounds, which makes it an ideal location for examining treatment-seeking behaviour related to infertility. Amuwo Odofin has a mix of urban and semi-urban features, providing access to healthcare facilities, yet it also presents challenges such as cultural beliefs and economic disparities that may affect women’s decisions regarding infertility treatment. Understanding the geographical and socio-cultural context of this setting is crucial for interpreting the data collected and drawing relevant conclusions about the experiences of women seeking infertility treatment in this region.
Target Population of the Study
The target population for this study consists of women experiencing infertility in Amuwo Odofin, with a focus on those who possess the knowledge and experiences relevant to the phenomenon under investigation. According to the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS, 2018), infertility affects approximately 25% of women in Nigeria, highlighting the significance of this population for the research. The total population of interest is estimated at 1,200 women within the community. Understanding the characteristics of this population is essential for selecting appropriate sampling techniques and ensuring that the study accurately reflects the experiences of women facing infertility challenges in Amuwo Odofin.
CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
Preamble
Presentation and Analysis of Data
CHAPTER FIVE
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Discussion of Findings
The treatment-seeking behaviour of women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin is influenced by a myriad of factors, including socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, social support, psychological factors, and healthcare system accessibility. The findings from the study reveal how these elements interact to shape women’s decisions to seek assistance for infertility, underscoring the complexity of this issue.
The study’s results indicate that socio-economic status significantly impacts women’s ability to access infertility treatment. For instance, Table 4.11 highlights that nearly half of the respondents (49.5%) agreed that their socio-economic status affects their access to treatment options, while 26.6% strongly agreed. This suggests that financial constraints are a prevalent barrier, corroborating the findings that women with higher socio-economic status are more likely to seek treatment due to their better access to financial resources and healthcare services. The data also reflects that employment status plays a crucial role; women with jobs tend to pursue treatment more actively than those who are unemployed, indicating the importance of economic stability in healthcare decisions.
Furthermore, the significant finding in Table 4.15, where 53.2% of respondents strongly agreed that a lack of financial resources is a barrier to accessing infertility treatment, reinforces the conclusion that socio-economic factors are critical determinants of treatment-seeking behaviour. The correlation between financial resources and treatment access highlights the necessity for targeted financial support mechanisms to empower women from lower-income backgrounds.
Cultural beliefs about infertility emerged as another significant influence on treatment-seeking behaviour. According to Table 4.12, 42.2% of respondents strongly agreed that cultural beliefs significantly influence their choices regarding treatment options. The stigma associated with infertility, often viewed as a source of shame, can deter women from seeking help, as many reported feeling isolated due to societal perceptions. This finding aligns with the understanding that cultural attitudes can create barriers, as evidenced by the study participants’ reflections on their experiences.
However, the data also suggests that cultural beliefs can motivate women to seek treatment, especially when tied to strong familial expectations about motherhood. The supportive role of family, as seen in Table 4.13, where 53.2% of respondents agreed that social support from family and friends encourages them to pursue treatment, highlights how cultural dynamics can be leveraged to facilitate treatment-seeking behaviour. This duality emphasizes the need for healthcare providers to engage with cultural contexts when addressing infertility issues.
The influence of social support was further substantiated by the findings. Table 4.13 indicates that a significant majority (53.2%) of respondents felt that social support from family and friends encouraged them to pursue treatment for infertility. This finding is pivotal, as it suggests that emotional and financial backing from loved ones can help mitigate the stigma surrounding infertility. Many women expressed that the encouragement they received made them feel empowered to seek medical help, thereby demonstrating the importance of a supportive social network in overcoming barriers to treatment.
The findings align with the literature that posits social support as a crucial determinant in healthcare decisions, particularly in sensitive areas like infertility. Healthcare interventions that incorporate family dynamics and support systems could enhance treatment uptake among women facing infertility challenges.
Psychological aspects also emerged as important influencers of treatment-seeking behaviour. The data indicated that personal beliefs about infertility and mental health significantly affected women’s decisions to seek help. The study found that women who maintained a positive outlook about treatment outcomes were more likely to pursue healthcare services, aligning with the results presented in Table 4.18, where 46.8% of respondents acknowledged a lack of information about infertility treatment options as a barrier. This indicates that educational interventions could play a role in improving women’s mental preparedness and willingness to seek help.
Moreover, the anxiety associated with infertility treatments can deter women from seeking assistance, as many participants voiced fears related to the potential failure of treatments. This psychological barrier suggests that counseling services focused on managing the emotional aspects of infertility could enhance women’s treatment-seeking behaviour.
The accessibility and quality of healthcare services also significantly impacted treatment-seeking behaviour. Findings from Table 4.16 reveal that 38.5% of respondents strongly agreed that limited availability of specialized infertility treatment centers affects their ability to seek help. This points to a critical barrier in the healthcare system that must be addressed to improve access to fertility services. The report further emphasizes that women who have had negative past experiences with healthcare providers are less likely to seek treatment again, indicating a need for improved patient-provider relationships and support systems.
In essence, the treatment-seeking behaviour of women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin is influenced by a complex interplay of socio-economic, cultural, psychological, and healthcare system factors. The study’s findings provide valuable insights into these dynamics, revealing that enhancing financial support, addressing cultural stigma, fostering social support networks, improving psychological counseling, and ensuring better access to quality healthcare are essential for empowering women to seek treatment. These results underscore the need for a comprehensive approach that considers these multifaceted influences, ultimately aiming to improve treatment outcomes and quality of life for women facing infertility challenges.
Implication of the Study to Nursing
The findings of the study regarding the treatment-seeking behaviour of women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin carry significant implications for nursing practice. Understanding these implications can enhance the quality of care provided to women experiencing infertility, leading to better health outcomes. This section discusses five key implications for nursing practice based on the study’s findings.
One of the primary implications of the study is the need for nurses to increase their awareness and understanding of the factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour among women facing infertility. Nurses play a pivotal role in patient education and advocacy. By being informed about socio-economic, cultural, and social influences on patients, nurses can better identify barriers to care. Educational programs and workshops focused on infertility can be developed and integrated into nursing curricula and continuous professional development. This will empower nurses to provide accurate information and support to women seeking treatment, ultimately facilitating a more supportive healthcare environment.
The study highlights the impact of cultural beliefs on treatment-seeking behaviour. Therefore, nurses must cultivate cultural competence in their practice. This involves recognizing and respecting the diverse cultural backgrounds of patients and understanding how these factors influence health beliefs and behaviours. Nurses should engage in active listening and ask open-ended questions to gain insights into their patients’ cultural contexts. Incorporating culturally relevant practices in patient education can enhance trust and communication, thereby improving the likelihood of women seeking infertility treatments. Training programs focusing on cultural sensitivity and awareness can significantly enhance nursing practice, ensuring that care is tailored to meet the unique needs of women from different backgrounds.
The findings emphasize the importance of social support in encouraging women to pursue infertility treatment. As frontline healthcare providers, nurses are in a unique position to facilitate and enhance social support networks for their patients. By recognizing the role of family and community in the treatment-seeking process, nurses can help build support systems that encourage women to seek necessary medical care. This could involve involving family members in educational sessions, providing resources for support groups, or connecting patients with community organizations focused on infertility support. By fostering a holistic approach that considers emotional and social dimensions, nurses can help create an environment where women feel more empowered to seek help.
The study identifies limited access to specialized infertility treatment centers as a significant barrier to care. Nurses have a crucial role in advocating for policy changes that improve healthcare access for women experiencing infertility. This includes advocating for the establishment of more specialized clinics, improved transportation options for patients, and equitable healthcare funding to reduce the financial burden associated with treatment. By collaborating with healthcare administrators, policymakers, and community leaders, nurses can help promote initiatives that address these barriers, thereby improving access to care for vulnerable populations. Advocacy training should be incorporated into nursing education to equip nurses with the skills necessary to influence healthcare policies effectively.
The complexity of infertility treatment requires a collaborative approach involving various healthcare professionals, including physicians, social workers, and mental health professionals. The study’s findings underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing the multifaceted factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour. Nurses can take the lead in fostering communication among team members to ensure comprehensive care for women with infertility. This collaboration may include joint care planning, shared resources, and coordinated follow-ups. Nurses should actively participate in team meetings, contributing their insights about patients’ experiences and needs. By working together, healthcare providers can create more effective treatment plans that consider the socio-economic, cultural, and social factors impacting women’s decisions to seek infertility care.
Consequently, the implications of the study for nursing practice are profound and multifaceted. By increasing awareness and education, providing culturally competent care, enhancing support systems, advocating for accessible healthcare, and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, nurses can significantly improve the treatment-seeking behaviour of women experiencing infertility. Implementing these findings in clinical practice will not only lead to better health outcomes for patients but also foster a more compassionate and responsive healthcare environment that prioritizes the unique needs of women struggling with infertility. As the nursing profession continues to evolve, embracing these implications will be essential in delivering high-quality, patient-centered care.
Limitations of the Study
The study has several limitations that must be acknowledged, as they may impact the interpretation of the findings. Firstly, the research was conducted in a specific geographic location, Amuwo Odofin, which may not represent the experiences of women with infertility in other regions of Nigeria or in different cultural contexts. This geographic limitation could affect the generalizability of the results, as socio-economic conditions, cultural beliefs, and access to healthcare services can vary significantly across different areas. Additionally, the sample size of 109 respondents, while adequate for the study, may not fully capture the diversity of experiences among all women facing infertility. A larger and more diverse sample could provide more comprehensive insights into the factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour.
Another limitation pertains to the study’s reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce response biases. Participants may have provided socially desirable answers rather than candid reflections on their experiences, particularly regarding sensitive topics such as infertility and its associated stigma. This potential bias could skew the results and affect the accuracy of the conclusions drawn. Furthermore, the cross-sectional design of the study limits the ability to establish causal relationships between the identified factors and treatment-seeking behaviour. Longitudinal studies that track changes over time could provide a more nuanced understanding of how these factors influence decisions related to infertility treatment. Overall, acknowledging these limitations is crucial for interpreting the findings and guiding future research in this area.
Summary
The study aimed to explore the factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour among women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin, Lagos State, Nigeria. This research is significant in addressing a pressing public health concern, as infertility can have profound social, psychological, and economic implications for women and their families. In this summary, each chapter of the study will be highlighted, emphasizing the critical findings and their relevance to understanding infertility treatment-seeking behaviour within this specific demographic.
The introductory chapter provided a comprehensive overview of the context of infertility in Nigeria, where the societal pressures to bear children often lead to stigma and emotional distress for affected women. It established the importance of investigating treatment-seeking behaviour to identify barriers and facilitators that influence women’s decisions to seek help. The problem statement articulated the need for targeted interventions to improve access to infertility treatments, given the complex interplay of factors such as socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, and social support systems. The research objectives, questions, and hypotheses were clearly defined, setting a robust framework for the study’s direction.
The literature review chapter extensively examined existing research on infertility, highlighting the various socio-cultural and economic factors that influence treatment-seeking behaviour. A notable finding was the significant role of socio-economic status, where women with higher incomes or better financial resources were more likely to seek treatment. This aligns with the study’s results, where the data showed that 49.5% of respondents strongly agreed that their socio-economic status impacts their ability to access infertility treatment options. This finding suggests that economic constraints significantly deter women from pursuing necessary healthcare services, emphasizing the importance of addressing financial barriers in interventions aimed at improving access to infertility treatments.
Cultural beliefs surrounding infertility were another crucial theme identified in the literature review. These beliefs can either encourage or hinder treatment-seeking behaviour. The results indicated that 84.4% of respondents agreed that cultural beliefs significantly influence their choices regarding treatment options. This insight reflects the need for culturally sensitive approaches in healthcare, as traditional beliefs may lead women to delay or forgo medical assistance in favor of alternative remedies or traditional practices. The data revealed that 53.2% of respondents felt that social support from family and friends encouraged them to pursue treatment, demonstrating the critical role of interpersonal relationships in navigating the complexities of infertility. These findings suggest that healthcare providers should consider integrating family and community dynamics into patient education and support programs to enhance treatment uptake.
The methodology chapter detailed the quantitative research design utilized to collect data from women experiencing infertility. A structured questionnaire was administered to 109 respondents, which allowed for the quantification of various factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour. The sample size was adequate for statistical analysis, providing robust data for interpretation. The validity and reliability of the research instruments were established, reinforcing the credibility of the findings. Ethical considerations were also emphasized, ensuring that participants’ rights and confidentiality were respected throughout the study. This methodological rigor supports the reliability of the study’s conclusions and reinforces the need for further research in this area to generalize findings across different contexts.
The results chapter presented a clear and concise analysis of the data collected. It included demographic information about the respondents, showcasing a diverse population of women with varying socio-economic backgrounds. The findings revealed that 53.2% of women identified lack of financial resources as a significant barrier to accessing infertility treatment services, indicating a strong correlation between economic status and treatment-seeking behaviour. Additionally, 47.7% of respondents reported that stigma associated with infertility prevented them from seeking healthcare services, illustrating the social pressures that women face in addressing reproductive health issues. The data emphasized the need for public awareness campaigns to reduce stigma and promote open discussions about infertility, ultimately encouraging women to seek necessary medical interventions.
Social support emerged as a vital factor influencing treatment-seeking behaviour. The results indicated that a substantial proportion of women felt encouraged to pursue treatment due to familial and community support. This aligns with the findings that highlighted the positive impact of social networks on women’s decisions to seek medical assistance. It suggests that healthcare practitioners should actively engage family members in the treatment process, providing education and support to alleviate fears and misconceptions about infertility and its treatment.
In the discussion section, the findings were analyzed in relation to existing literature, reaffirming the complexities surrounding treatment-seeking behaviour in infertility. The strong correlation between socio-economic status and access to treatment underscores the need for comprehensive healthcare policies that address financial barriers and provide support for women from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Moreover, the significance of cultural beliefs and social support reinforces the necessity for culturally competent healthcare providers who understand the unique challenges faced by women in their communities.
The implications of the study for nursing practice are profound. Healthcare professionals must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to provide empathetic and culturally sensitive care to women experiencing infertility. This includes understanding the socio-economic factors that may impact their patients’ decisions and fostering an environment where women feel supported and empowered to seek treatment. Nursing education should integrate training on the psychological and social dimensions of infertility to prepare practitioners to address the diverse needs of their patients effectively.
Additionally, the study’s findings indicate a clear need for public health initiatives aimed at increasing awareness and reducing stigma associated with infertility. Nurses and healthcare providers can play a pivotal role in advocating for community education programs that promote understanding and acceptance of infertility as a health issue. By engaging with communities, healthcare professionals can help dismantle harmful stereotypes and create a supportive environment that encourages women to seek the necessary medical interventions for infertility.
The limitations of the study were also acknowledged, including the potential for self-reported biases and the limited generalizability of the findings to other regions or populations. These limitations highlight the need for further research that encompasses a broader demographic and utilizes qualitative methods to gain deeper insights into the experiences of women facing infertility. Such studies could explore the emotional and psychological aspects of treatment-seeking behaviour, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges women encounter.
In summary, this study has provided valuable insights into the factors influencing treatment-seeking behaviour among women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin. The findings underscore the significance of socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, and social support in shaping women’s decisions to seek treatment. By addressing these factors through targeted interventions and community education, healthcare providers can enhance access to infertility treatments and support women in navigating their reproductive health journeys. The study’s implications for nursing practice highlight the critical role of healthcare professionals in fostering an inclusive and supportive environment for women experiencing infertility. This research not only contributes to the existing literature on infertility but also paves the way for future studies aimed at improving the overall reproductive health and well-being of women in Nigeria and beyond.
Conclusion
The findings from this study underscore the multifaceted nature of treatment-seeking behaviour among women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin. The hypotheses tested revealed significant relationships between socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, and social support on women’s decisions to seek treatment for infertility. Each of these factors played a critical role in shaping the treatment-seeking behaviours observed in the study population, highlighting the complexities and challenges faced by women navigating infertility.
Firstly, the hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between socio-economic status and treatment-seeking behaviour was decisively rejected. The results indicated a strong correlation, with many respondents affirming that their financial circumstances significantly influenced their ability to access infertility treatments. Specifically, a majority of participants identified lack of financial resources as a substantial barrier, which aligns with existing literature on the impact of economic factors on healthcare access. This finding suggests that interventions aimed at improving the financial accessibility of infertility services, such as subsidized treatment options or financial counseling, could significantly enhance treatment uptake among women in this demographic.
Secondly, the hypothesis regarding the influence of cultural beliefs on treatment-seeking behaviour was also rejected. The data revealed that cultural perceptions and traditional beliefs surrounding infertility profoundly impacted women’s willingness to seek medical assistance. Many respondents acknowledged that societal stigma and cultural expectations deterred them from pursuing formal treatment options. This finding highlights the urgent need for public health initiatives focused on addressing these cultural barriers. By fostering open discussions about infertility and integrating culturally sensitive approaches into healthcare services, providers can create a more supportive environment that encourages women to seek the help they need.
Finally, the hypothesis that social support does not positively impact treatment-seeking behaviour was likewise refuted. The results indicated that social support from family and friends significantly influenced women’s decisions to pursue treatment for infertility. A majority of participants reported feeling encouraged to seek help due to the backing of their social networks. This underscores the importance of involving family members in the treatment process and recognizing the role of social relationships in healthcare decision-making. By leveraging social support systems, healthcare providers can enhance the likelihood that women will seek the necessary treatments and interventions for infertility.
In conclusion, this study has illuminated critical factors that influence treatment-seeking behaviour among women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin. The significant relationships identified between socio-economic status, cultural beliefs, and social support indicate the need for comprehensive, multi-faceted approaches to address the barriers women face in accessing infertility treatment. The findings advocate for policy interventions aimed at improving financial accessibility to care, increasing public awareness about infertility, and fostering supportive social environments that encourage treatment-seeking behaviours.
As healthcare professionals, it is essential to recognize and address these factors in clinical practice to improve the reproductive health outcomes of women experiencing infertility. By implementing culturally sensitive practices and engaging family members in the treatment process, healthcare providers can better support women in their infertility journeys, ultimately leading to improved access to treatment and enhanced quality of life for affected individuals. Further research is warranted to explore these dynamics in broader contexts and to develop targeted interventions that address the unique challenges faced by women with infertility across different settings.
Recommendations
Based on the research objectives and findings related to the treatment-seeking behaviour of women with infertility in Amuwo Odofin, the following recommendations are proposed:
1.Enhance Financial Accessibility: Develop programs that provide financial assistance or subsidized rates for infertility treatments, particularly for low-income women. This could include partnerships with healthcare providers and government agencies to create affordable payment plans or grant programs to reduce the financial burden of treatment.
2.Increase Awareness and Education: Implement community-based awareness campaigns to educate women and families about infertility, available treatments, and the importance of seeking help early. These initiatives should address myths and misconceptions surrounding infertility and promote a more supportive cultural attitude toward treatment-seeking behaviours.
3.Culturally Sensitive Healthcare Services: Design healthcare services that respect and incorporate cultural beliefs and practices related to infertility. This could involve training healthcare providers to understand and navigate cultural sensitivities, ensuring that treatment approaches are acceptable and aligned with patients’ cultural backgrounds.
4.Strengthen Social Support Systems: Encourage the formation of support groups for women experiencing infertility. These groups can provide a platform for sharing experiences, emotional support, and practical advice, thus fostering a sense of community and encouraging women to seek treatment together.
5.Collaborate with Community Leaders: Engage local leaders and influencers to advocate for the importance of addressing infertility openly within the community. Their involvement can help shift cultural perceptions and reduce stigma associated with infertility and treatment-seeking behaviours.
6.Integrate Mental Health Services: Recognize the emotional and psychological impact of infertility by integrating mental health support into infertility treatment programs. Providing counseling services can help women cope with the stress and emotional challenges of infertility, making them more likely to pursue treatment.
7.Facilitate Accessibility to Treatment Centers: Improve the geographical accessibility of specialized infertility treatment centers. This may involve establishing satellite clinics or mobile health units that can reach underserved areas, ensuring that women have easier access to necessary services.
8.Policy Advocacy for Reproductive Health: Advocate for policy changes that prioritize reproductive health and fertility treatment within the national health agenda. This includes pushing for improved funding and resources dedicated to infertility services and creating frameworks that ensure equitable access for all women, regardless of socio-economic status.
References
- World Health Organization. (2018). International classification of diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11). Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Fidler, A. T., & Bernstein, J. (2019). Infertility: From a personal to a public health problem. Public Health Reports, 114(6), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/114.6.494.
- Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., & Stevens, G. A. (2022). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Medicine, 9(12), e1001356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.
- Bell, E. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE Publications.
- Charan, J., & Biswas, T. (2019). How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.116232.
- Charmaz, K. (2016). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2018). Management and business research. SAGE Publications.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (2015). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
- Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., & DeWaard, J. (2021). Research methods in the social sciences (8th ed.). Worth Publishers.
