The Influence of Social Media on Public Opinion and Its Impact on Policy-making in Nigeria (2015-2021)
Chapter One
Objective of the Study
The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the role of public opinion from social media in influencing policy-making in Nigeria between 2015 and 2021. Specifically, the study aims to:
- Assess the extent to which public opinion expressed on social media influences policy decisions in Nigeria.
- Identify the mechanisms through which policymakers engage with social media-driven public opinion.
- Explore the challenges and limitations that hinder the effectiveness of social media in influencing policy outcomes.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Review
Public Opinion
Public opinion refers to the collective views, attitudes, and beliefs held by the general public on various issues. It plays a crucial role in shaping government policies as it serves as a reflection of the needs and preferences of the citizens. In democratic systems, public opinion is important because it informs elected officials about the desires and concerns of the people, allowing for a more responsive government. Public opinion can be measured through surveys, polls, and other forms of public engagement, which help policymakers understand the population’s stance on key issues (Abbas, Aman, Nurunnabi, & Bano, 2019).
In Nigeria, public opinion is dynamic and influenced by various factors, including media, cultural norms, and socio-economic conditions. The characteristics of public opinion in Nigeria often reflect the country’s diverse population, with different ethnic, religious, and economic groups expressing varying preferences and concerns. Social media platforms have increasingly become the major venues for the expression of public opinion, particularly in urban areas. These platforms offer an outlet for citizens to voice their opinions on pressing matters such as governance, security, and social justice (Arisanty, Wiradharma, & Fiani, 2020). Additionally, public opinion in Nigeria is highly influenced by the political environment, with elections, protests, and crises playing pivotal roles in shaping collective views.
Public opinion is essential in a democracy as it fosters accountability and transparency within government systems. In Nigeria, public opinion can influence government decisions, especially during periods of heightened political activity, such as during elections or when there are mass protests. Social media platforms have amplified the voice of the public, making it easier for citizens to mobilize and demand change, thus affecting the policy-making process. For example, the #EndSARS protests exemplified how public opinion could prompt the government to reconsider certain policies and take action on police brutality (Hagen, Keller, Neely, DePaula, & Robert-Cooperman, 2018).
Social Media
Social media refers to digital platforms that enable users to create, share, and interact with content and other users in real time. These platforms allow for user-generated content and foster communication through forums, posts, images, videos, and live interactions. The primary types of social media platforms include social networking sites (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn), microblogging platforms (e.g., Twitter), photo-sharing apps (e.g., Instagram), video-sharing sites (e.g., YouTube), and messaging apps (e.g., WhatsApp). These platforms play a vital role in shaping public discourse and fostering real-time interactions among users, influencing opinions, behaviours, and political engagement (Adeyemi, Afolabi, & Alabi, 2019).
The growth of social media in Nigeria has been remarkable, especially over the past decade. Nigeria has seen a significant increase in internet penetration, with a large portion of the population becoming active on various social media platforms. The rise of mobile technology has been a driving force behind this expansion, as smartphones provide users with access to social media on the go. The growing popularity of social media in Nigeria has made it a powerful tool for disseminating information, mobilizing political movements, and shaping public opinion. Social media usage in Nigeria has been linked to key socio-political events, such as the #EndSARS protests, where citizens used the platforms to organize, share information, and demand change (Ogunleye & Aremu, 2020).
Social media serves as a crucial communication tool in the public sphere, allowing for an open and interactive exchange of ideas. It offers an avenue for citizens to express their views, engage with policymakers, and influence decision-making processes. In Nigeria, the role of social media in political communication has grown, as it provides a platform for citizens to participate in discussions that were once dominated by traditional media. Social media has democratized information sharing, enabling a broader range of voices to be heard in the public sphere, particularly on issues such as governance, human rights, and public policies (Ezeani, 2018). Through social media, public opinion can be swiftly expressed, influencing the political landscape and encouraging governmental responsiveness.
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The research design serves as the framework for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data, ensuring that the study meets its objectives and answers the research questions (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). In this study, a quantitative survey research design was employed. A quantitative approach is appropriate for studies that aim to examine relationships between variables, test hypotheses, and establish patterns that can be generalized (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, 2019). This design allows for the collection of numerical data, which is essential in identifying correlations, testing theories, and making predictions based on the study’s objectives.
A survey research design is particularly suitable for this study because it facilitates the collection of data from a large number of respondents in a structured and systematic manner. This method allows for the efficient gathering of information on respondents’ attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours, and is ideal for studies that seek to quantify aspects such as public opinion and behaviour. The design also ensures that the research findings can be generalized to the wider population, enhancing the validity and reliability of the results. By using this approach, the study sought to investigate the role of social media in shaping public opinion and influencing policy decisions in Nigeria, an objective that demands statistical analysis and a large-scale data collection process.
Population of the Study
The population of a study refers to the entire group of individuals or items from which a sample is drawn (Bell, 2022). In this study, the target population comprised 1,200 respondents, consisting of Nigerian citizens who engage with social media platforms regularly. This population was selected because social media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing policy decisions in Nigeria, particularly in the context of political and social movements (Ajayi & Daramola, 2019). The inclusion of 1,200 respondents provides a diverse and representative sample, encompassing individuals from various socio-economic backgrounds, geographical locations, and political affiliations.
The choice of 1,200 respondents is justified by the need for a sample size large enough to provide robust and generalizable findings while also allowing for the identification of trends across different demographic groups. According to Charan and Biswas (2019), the sample size in a survey should be sufficient to achieve statistical power, meaning it must be large enough to detect meaningful relationships between variables. Furthermore, by targeting 1,200 respondents, this study ensures that the sample size reflects the diversity of the population and provides a comprehensive understanding of how social media influences public opinion and policy decisions in Nigeria.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Data Presentation
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
This research was conducted to examine the relationship between public opinion expressed on social media and policy decisions in Nigeria from 2015 to 2021. The study aimed to explore how policymakers engage with social media-driven public opinion, the extent to which public opinion influences policy formulation, and the challenges that limit the effectiveness of social media in shaping policy outcomes. To achieve these objectives, data were collected from 109 respondents, analyzed through a series of statistical tests, including the one-sample t-test, with the results presented in various tables. The findings from this analysis provide important insights into the role of social media in modern governance and the influence of public opinion on policy formulation in Nigeria during the period under review.
One of the key findings of this study is the existence of a significant relationship between public opinion on social media and policy decisions in Nigeria. The results from Table 4.20, which tested the hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between public opinion on social media and policy decisions, revealed a t-value of 32.267 with a p-value of 0.000. This indicates that the null hypothesis was rejected, confirming that public opinion expressed on social media platforms played a critical role in influencing policy decisions in Nigeria between 2015 and 2021. This finding aligns with the increasing global recognition of social media as a powerful tool for political participation and public discourse. In Nigeria, social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have provided a space for citizens to voice their concerns, demand accountability, and advocate for policy changes. Movements such as #EndSARS illustrate the capacity of social media to mobilize large segments of the population and pressure the government to respond to public demands.
The study also found that Nigerian policymakers actively engage with public opinion expressed on social media platforms. The one-sample t-test conducted to test the second hypothesis, which posited that Nigerian policymakers do not actively engage with social media-driven public opinion, produced a t-value of 26.081 (p < 0.05). The rejection of this hypothesis suggests that policymakers in Nigeria are increasingly aware of the importance of monitoring social media platforms to gauge public sentiment. This finding is significant because it demonstrates a shift in the traditional methods of policy formulation, where feedback from citizens is no longer limited to formal channels such as town hall meetings, surveys, or opinion polls. Policymakers now use social media to track real-time reactions to government actions and gauge public support or opposition to proposed policies. However, while the data suggest that policymakers engage with social media, the study also found that this engagement is often selective. Policymakers tend to respond to issues that gain significant traction or widespread attention, ignoring those that do not receive the same level of visibility online.
The third major finding from the study relates to the challenges and barriers that prevent social media from fully influencing policy outcomes in Nigeria. The hypothesis that challenges such as misinformation, digital polarization, and selective responsiveness do not hinder the influence of social media on policy decisions was tested, yielding a t-value of 35.315 (p < 0.05). The rejection of this hypothesis confirms that these challenges are indeed significant obstacles to the effective use of social media in policy formulation. Misinformation, in particular, was identified as a major concern. Social media platforms, while providing a space for open discourse, have also become breeding grounds for the rapid spread of false or unverified information. This creates confusion and makes it difficult for both the public and policymakers to discern credible opinions from manipulated or misleading narratives. The challenge of digital polarization, where individuals are exposed primarily to viewpoints that align with their pre-existing beliefs, further complicates the ability of policymakers to gauge a balanced public opinion. This echo chamber effect means that policymakers may not be receiving an accurate representation of the broader public’s views.
Another challenge identified in the study is the lack of structured communication channels between social media users and policymakers. Although policymakers monitor social media to gauge public sentiment, there is often no direct mechanism for meaningful dialogue between the two parties. This creates a barrier to the effective translation of public opinion into policy changes. Social media users may express their opinions on various issues, but without a formal avenue for feedback, these opinions may not be adequately considered in policy discussions. This finding highlights the need for more structured interaction between social media users and policymakers to ensure that public opinion is not only heard but also acted upon in a systematic and constructive manner.
The study also found that political influences and biases often prevent public opinion on social media from being translated into actual policy changes. Policymakers may be reluctant to act on public opinion if it conflicts with their political agenda or the interests of powerful stakeholders. This finding is consistent with the broader literature on the challenges of policymaking in highly politicized environments, where decisions are often influenced by competing interests rather than public sentiment alone. The data suggest that while social media can amplify voices calling for change, these voices may not always result in policy shifts due to political resistance or competing priorities among policymakers.
Furthermore, the study identified that Nigerian policymakers are more likely to respond to social media opinions that receive a large number of interactions, such as likes, shares, and comments. This finding underscores the importance of visibility in the digital age, where the volume of engagement with a particular issue can determine its likelihood of being addressed by policymakers. However, this raises concerns about the representativeness of such opinions, as issues that do not garner widespread attention may be overlooked, even if they are of significant importance to certain segments of the population.
Conclusion
Based on the results of the hypotheses tested, this study concludes that public opinion expressed on social media significantly influences policy decisions in Nigeria between 2015 and 2021. The rejection of the first hypothesis affirms that social media platforms serve as crucial spaces where public discourse impacts governance and decision-making. Policymakers actively engage with these platforms, monitoring trends and public sentiment, as evidenced by the rejection of the second hypothesis. This demonstrates that policymakers are aware of the influence of social media in shaping political and societal discourse.
However, the third hypothesis indicates that substantial challenges, such as misinformation, digital polarization, and selective responsiveness, hinder the full potential of social media in influencing policy. While public opinion is acknowledged, political biases, selective attention to high-engagement topics, and the spread of misinformation limit the effectiveness of social media as a tool for meaningful policy change.
In conclusion, social media in Nigeria represents a double-edged sword—capable of influencing policy but constrained by various challenges. To maximize its potential, efforts should be made to improve communication between policymakers and social media users, address the spread of misinformation, and reduce political bias in policy responses to online public opinion.
Recommendations
Based on the research objectives, the following recommendations are made to enhance the influence of public opinion on social media in policy-making processes in Nigeria:
- Strengthen the Engagement Between Policymakers and Social Media Users: It is essential to establish formal mechanisms that enable consistent and constructive interaction between policymakers and the public through social media. This can include town hall meetings, digital forums, and live-streamed consultations that give the public a voice in the policy formulation process.
- Enhance Media Literacy and Combat Misinformation: Public education on identifying credible sources of information and understanding the effects of misinformation should be prioritized. Government agencies, civil society organizations, and social media platforms should work together to create awareness campaigns that help users differentiate between legitimate public opinion and false information.
- Increase Transparency in Policy-Making: Policymakers should openly communicate how they incorporate public opinions from social media into their decision-making processes. Providing feedback on how online discussions influence policy decisions can boost public confidence and encourage more meaningful participation.
- Address Barriers to Digital Participation: To ensure that a broader spectrum of the population can engage in political discussions on social media, the government should improve internet infrastructure and lower the costs of data usage. Additionally, digital inclusion initiatives can help bridge the gap for marginalized communities, allowing for a more diverse range of public opinions.
- Develop Tools for Analyzing Social Media Trends: Policymakers should invest in advanced tools to analyze social media trends and assess public sentiment. By using data analytics, natural language processing, and artificial intelligence, policymakers can better gauge the authenticity of public opinions, identify key issues, and make more informed decisions that reflect the needs and desires of the populace.
Limitations of the Study
The limitations of this study primarily stemmed from its reliance on self-reported data from social media users, which may have introduced response bias. Participants may have exaggerated or understated their level of engagement with policy discussions on social media or the impact of such engagements on policy-making processes. Furthermore, the study’s sample size, though adequate for general analysis, may not be fully representative of the diverse social media user base in Nigeria. This could limit the generalizability of the findings across different regions, socio-economic groups, and demographics, particularly those without regular internet access.
Another limitation was the absence of direct input from policymakers, which restricted the study to the public’s perception of how social media influences policy decisions. This excluded an analysis of the internal processes and considerations policymakers undertake when engaging with public opinion online. The study also faced challenges in addressing the complex and rapidly evolving nature of social media platforms, where new features and trends continually emerge, potentially affecting how public opinion is formed and how it impacts policy-making. Consequently, the study’s findings may not fully capture the dynamic interactions between social media and policy in the Nigerian context.
Suggestions for Further Studies
Suggestions for further studies should focus on addressing the limitations identified in this research and exploring areas that were not fully covered. One important area for further research is the inclusion of policymakers’ perspectives on the role of social media in shaping policy decisions. Future studies could investigate how Nigerian policymakers monitor, interpret, and respond to public opinion on social media, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the interaction between the government and the public through these platforms. This would help to reveal any discrepancies between public perception and actual policymaking practices.
Additionally, further studies could expand the scope by exploring how different social media platforms influence policy in various sectors, such as healthcare, education, and security. This would help identify whether certain platforms are more effective in promoting policy change. Moreover, comparative studies across different regions in Nigeria could offer insights into regional disparities in how social media is utilized for political engagement. Longitudinal research could also be valuable, tracking changes in the influence of social media over a longer period and examining how evolving technologies and public communication patterns continue to shape the policymaking landscape in Nigeria.
References
- Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The impact of social media on learning behaviour for sustainable education: Evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(6), 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061683
- Alison Power (2023). What is Social Media? Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/18184466/What_is_social_media Remco et al (2024). Analyzing social influence through social media, a structured literature review. Retrieved from https://research.ou.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/56262114/SnijdersHelmsISconf.pdf
- Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
- Arisanty, M., Wiradharma, G., & Fiani, I. (2020). Optimizing social media platforms as information dissemination media. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 5(2), 266. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i2.700
- Ausat, A. M. A., Permana, R. M., Angellia, F., Subagja, A. D., & Astutik, W. S. (2023). Utilisation of social media in market research and business decision analysis. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i2.12485
- Bell, E. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE Publications.
