Performance Management: A Veritable Tool for Corporate Performance
Chapter One
Objectives of the study
The objectives of this study are to critically examine the veritable of performance management to the corporate performance and highlight the importance of performance management:
- To know how personal development influences corporate performance.
- To find out how compensation influences corporate performance.
- To identify how employee performances influence institution performance.
- To know the performance management system and how it helps in institutional development. i.e. Access the veritable performance management, weakness, strength, and support
- Finally, to present suggestions and recommendations to the organization on performance management scheme.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
In this chapter the researcher analyzed the existing literature authored by different writers. Literature review of an extensive nature was carried out to enable an understanding of the impact of performance management systems on employee performance.
Conceptual definitions
Armstrong (2004) defined performance Management as a means of getting better results from the whole organizations by understanding and managing within an agreed framework, performance of planned goals, standards and competence requirements.
Performance management
“Performance management is a process of designing and executing motivational strategies, interventions and drivers with on objective to transform the raw potential of human resource into performance. All human beings possess potential within themselves in a few or more functional areas. However, utilization and conversion of this potential into deliverable performances is often sub optimal due to a variety of reasons. Performance management acts as an agent in converting the potential into performance by removing the intermediate barriers as well as motivating the human resource” (Kandula, 2006).
The study of performance management has been popular within human resource management study. Performance is defined as deploying and managing the components of the causal model that lead to the timely attainment of stated objectives within constraints specific to the firm and to the situation (Lebas, 1995). At an organizational level of analysis it’s assumed that an organization that is performing well is one that is successfully attaining its objectives; in other words, one that is effectively implementing an appropriate strategy (Otley, 1999).
According to Otley (1999), a general performance management considers such problems: What are the key objectives that are central to the organization`s overall future success, and how does it go about evaluating its achievement for each of these objectives? What strategies and plans has the organization adopted and what are the processes and activities that it has decided will be required for it to successfully implement these? How does it assess and measure the performance of these activities? What level of performance does the organization need to achieve in each of the areas defined in the above two questions, and how does it go about setting appropriate performance targets for them? What rewards will managers (and other employee) gain by achieving these performance targets (or conversely, what penalties will they suffer by failing to achieving them)?
According to Fletcher (2001), who gave a completed and comprehensive HR related performance management definition which is “an approach to creating a shared vision of the purpose and aims of the organization, helping each individual employee understand and recognize their part in contributing to them, and in so doing manage and enhance the performance of both the individual; and the organization”. Similarly, performance management is management processes for ensuring employees are focusing on their work efforts in ways that contribute to achieving the organization’s mission. It consists of three phases: Setting expectations for employee performance, maintaining a dialogue between supervisors and employees to keep performance on track and measuring actual performance relative to performance expectation
Performance management involves managing employee efforts, based on measured performance outcomes. Therefore determining what constitutes good performance and how the different aspects of high performance can be measured is critical to the design of an effective performance management process. And performance management effectiveness increase when there is ongoing feedback, behavior-based measures are used and preset goals and trained raters are employed (Lawler, 2003).
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Introduction
This chapter focuses on the methodology, which was used in the study. It shows how data was collected from various sources and the techniques by which data was analyzed.
Research design
Research design can be conceived as a mixed methods study employing a case study design to assess the impact of performance management systems on employee performance. Performance management system is the main independent variable upon which employee performance is dependent. The study took a convergent design under mixed methods where by qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently. The analysis of data was done separately and merged at the point of interpretation, to obtain a complete understanding of the research problem.
Population of the study
The study involved 120 respondents randomly selected from a total population of 150 employees of the University of Uyo. This sample size has been selected given the limited time and financial constraints of this study. By using a case study design findings were representative of the populations from which the sample was drawn but was expected to have limited external validity (Generalization).
These included 5 top management, 10 administrators, 80 teaching staff, and 25 non- teaching staff. Stratified sampling which involves identifying groups in the population was used.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to find out the impact of performance management systems on corporate performance. This chapter presents the findings of the study. The coverage will be on the analysis, presentation and evaluation of data taken from the sample population.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Introduction
The researcher has analyzed that performance management system has an impact on employee performance. When employees performs well the achievement of intended objectives in the institution matures quickly. Performance management systems provide valuable information for corporate management; their purpose is to align performance of every employee with corporate strategy and objectives.
Summary of the major findings
The impact of performance management systems on changing the way employee work
From the findings 46.7% of the respondents were of the opinion that PMS has changed the way they work through training in terms of imparting knowledge to meet challenges which arise at work. This is an indicator that PMS has a role to play at work, 36.7% were of the opinion that PMS has not changed the way they work while 16.6% of the respondents didn’t know whether PMS has impact on their work or not. This could be brought by lack of awareness, or how performance management process has been operated in the institution.
Conclusion
The objectives of the study were met and the research questions were answered. From the study it was concluded that, there is a relationship between performance management system and employee performance. Performance management systems trigger the achievement of institution goals by influencing employee performance.
Performance management systems give directions on what to be done, the mode of doing it and give indicators for the outcomes. Performance management systems improve both quality and quantity of work done and bring all activities in line with institution or organization goals.
Performance management systems link the employee performance and success of the institution, as a result of developing employee’ skills and competences. Developing, planning and managing, and reviewing employee performance has been most important aspects for PMS.
Performance management system is not a tool that is not well known by many employees in higher learning institutions. The most known type of evaluation which is much also practiced in many of the institutions is performance appraisal which is done annually.
Many of the reasons institution report disappointing results from their PMS can be attributed to either implementation or execution, resulting in line managers and employees not taking ownership of the process and treating the PMS as a compliance activity rather than an opportunity to improve performance. When these issues are addressed, and the institution commits resources to the process, the institution can expect benefit.
Although from the observations, it has been revealed that PMS has a lot of benefit to employees and institution at large but it has not yet been utilized to maximum point of getting the benefit out of it.
Institutions implementing PMS must take a holistic approach remembering that PMS involves far more than performing an annual appraisal and expecting performance to improve as a result. As stated by Latham et al. (2005) and Ken Sheridan (2009, pers. comm. 19 September 2009), the cultural transformation to performance based can take years to achieve and requires the organizations to commit the necessary resources. A PMS can be a critical tool for the organization to achieve the transformation.
Recommendations
The institution must view PMS as holistically, encompassing all the elements such as institution culture. Without this capability or desire the PMS is likely to become a compliance activity rather than adding value to the organization and individual employees.
Sensitization to all employees must be taken into account to create awareness on the implications of performance management systems. PMS tool provides tangible benefits to the institutions, including ability to ensure development plans in line with “set objectives and ensure there is a direct correlation between the two thus providing employees with growth and opportunity within the institution.
Line managers should be trained properly to conduct the employee performance review as one of the elements of PMS. They also need to understand the importance of conducting employee performance review in long term perspective. They should be given motivation to carry out these human resource activities as well as make them aware about the consequences of not allowing the set guideline, which can be ensured by evaluating their performances on all managerial activities especially on human resource management.
There should be reasonable compensation for higher performers.PMS has a role to play in terms of rewarding higher performers but high performance should be proportional to its reward if we are to increase the morale of the employees.
There should be a clear methodology while conducting performance management systems to avoid misconception of it. Strategies should be clearly understood as well as expectation of the outcome.
REFERENCES
- Adam,J. (2007) ,Business Research Methodology,A Background Material for Students and Other Readers.
- Aguinis ,H. (2009), Performance Management. 2nd edn, Person education, Inc., publishing as Prentice Hall.
- Armstrong,M. (2006), A Handbook of Human Resources Management Practice,10th edn,Kogan Page, London.
- Carlson etal(2006),Effective Human Resources Management in Small and Medium Enterprises:Global Perspective,IGI Global,USA
- Coelho, J.F.G.M. & Moy, D. (2003), The New Performance Evaluation Methodology and its Integration with Management Systems. The TQM Magazine, 15(1), 25-29.
- De Waal,A.(2003), Behavioural factors for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems,Management DecisionVolume 41.
- Deadrick, D. L. & Gardner, D. G. (1997), Distribution Ratings of Performance Levels and Variability: An Examination of Rating Validity in a Field Setting, Group & Organization Management Journal 39 (4).
- Fletcher,C. (2001),Performance appraisal and management:The developing research agenda,Journal of Occupation and Orgarnization Psychology,Volume 74.
- Gold, D.(1969), “Statistical Tests and Substantive Significance “American Sociologist, 4(1): 42–46.
- Guest, D.E. (1999),Human Resource Management: The Workers Verdict. Human Resource Management,Journal 9.
- Gungor, P. (2011). The Relationship between Reward Management System and. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1510–1520. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect. com.
- Halanchmi, A. (2005).Performance Measurement is only One Way of Managing Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,54(7),502-516.
- Heinrich, C. J. (2002), Outcomes Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness, Public Administration Review, 62, 712-726.
- Herzberg,F.(2009),One more time. How do you motivate employees? Cambridge,MA:Hrvard Business School Press.
