Godfatherism and Nigerian Politics (2013-2023)
Chapter One
Objective of the Study
This study aims to examine the phenomenon of godfatherism in Nigerian politics between 2013 and 2023, focusing on its impact on the political process, governance, and democratic consolidation in the country. Specifically, the study aims to:
- Investigate godfatherism’s role in shaping Nigeria’s electoral outcomes from 2013 to 2023.
- Examine the impact of godfatherism on governance and political accountability in Nigeria during the same period.
- Explore the consequences of godfatherism on political party structures and internal democracy within Nigeria’s major political parties.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Review
Godfatherism in Politics
Godfatherism in politics refers to a political arrangement where influential figures, often termed “godfathers,” use their resources, power, and influence to manipulate political outcomes. In the Nigerian context, godfatherism has deep historical roots, dating back to the country’s early post-independence political era. During this period, notable figures played a critical role in shaping the political landscape by anointing candidates and controlling the political process to maintain their dominance (Nkwede et al., 2022). This practice has since evolved and become deeply entrenched in the fabric of Nigerian politics, significantly influencing the nation’s democratic development.
Unlike political patronage, where loyalty and favours are exchanged between a patron and a client, godfatherism extends beyond simple loyalty. It involves total control over political officeholders, whereby the godfather dictates policies, appointments, and governance strategies once their protégés are in power (Attah et al., 2020). The relationship between the godfather and the politician is hierarchical and one-sided, as the godfather is often the ultimate decision-maker in major political issues. This system stifles the autonomy of elected officials and undermines democratic principles such as accountability and transparency.
Godfatherism has become a prevalent form of political patronage in Nigeria due to the country’s political instability, weak institutions, and a culture of impunity. The dominance of godfathers over the political process results in the appointment of candidates based on loyalty to the godfather, rather than on merit or the will of the people (Chukwuma, 2020). In many cases, godfathers can manipulate electoral processes through financial backing, media influence, and even intimidation to ensure that their chosen candidates emerge victorious in elections.
The historical evolution of godfatherism in Nigeria can be traced to the post-colonial era when political leaders began consolidating power through informal networks. The military era further entrenched this practice, as those who wielded power at the top levels of government often relied on a network of loyalists to maintain their influence (Scott, 2020). As democracy was re-established in Nigeria, godfathers adapted to the new system, using political parties as vehicles to control electoral outcomes. Today, godfatherism continues to be a dominant force in Nigerian politics, distinguishing itself from other forms of political patronage through its extensive control over the political system.
Electoral Politics and Democratic Consolidation
Electoral politics in Nigeria has been significantly shaped by godfatherism, a phenomenon that profoundly influences the electoral process and the consolidation of democracy. Godfatherism often skews electoral outcomes by placing power in the hands of a few influential individuals who use their resources and influence to control candidate selection and election results. This control undermines the democratic principle of free and fair elections, as candidates chosen by godfathers are typically expected to prioritize the interests of their patrons over those of the electorate (Olawale, 2021).
In democratic systems, elections are supposed to reflect the will of the people, providing a mechanism for citizens to choose their representatives and hold them accountable. However, in Nigeria, godfatherism distorts this process by ensuring that only those who align with the interests of the godfathers have a chance of being elected. This creates a political environment where elections are less about merit or public support and more about loyalty and favouritism (Attah et al., 2020). The practice of godfatherism therefore erodes public trust in the electoral system and contributes to a culture of political patronage and corruption.
Godfatherism also impacts democratic consolidation in Nigeria. Democratic consolidation refers to the process by which a new democracy matures and becomes stable, with democratic norms and institutions firmly entrenched. The pervasive influence of godfathers hampers this process by perpetuating undemocratic practices and preventing the emergence of a truly competitive political environment. Political stability and effective governance are compromised when godfathers, rather than elected officials, hold real power over decision-making and policy formulation (Chukwuma, 2020).
Moreover, the influence of godfathers often results in the marginalization of grassroots political participation. When political officeholders are primarily selected based on their allegiance to godfathers, the interests and needs of ordinary citizens are frequently ignored. This lack of representation undermines the democratic principle of inclusivity and further hinders democratic consolidation by reinforcing elite control over political processes (Scott, 2020).
In summary, godfatherism significantly affects electoral politics and democratic consolidation in Nigeria by distorting the electoral process, fostering corruption, and stifling genuine democratic participation. This creates a challenging environment for the development of a robust and stable democratic system.
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study adopted a quantitative research design to systematically explore the impact of godfatherism on political processes in Nigeria. A quantitative approach was chosen due to its capacity to provide statistical data that can be analyzed to identify patterns and relationships (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, 2019). This design facilitates the examination of hypotheses and the measurement of variables related to godfatherism’s effects on governance, electoral processes, and political stability. The justification for using this design lies in its ability to provide empirical evidence through structured data collection methods, which is essential for understanding the broad impact of political phenomena like godfatherism (Bell, Bryman, & Harley, 2019).
Population of the Study
The target population for this study consisted of political actors, government officials, and citizens who are actively engaged or have substantial knowledge of the political landscape in Nigeria. The chosen population size of 1200 respondents was justified by the need for a comprehensive understanding of various perspectives on godfatherism across different levels of political engagement (Frankfort-Nachmias, Nachmias, & DeWaard, 2021). This number ensures a representative sample that can provide diverse insights into the effects of godfatherism on political dynamics and governance.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Data Presentation
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
The analysis of the study provides a comprehensive overview of the impact of godfatherism on Nigerian politics from 2013 to 2023. This section summarizes the key findings from the research, reflecting on the influence of godfatherism on electoral outcomes, governance, political party structures, and democratic processes. The study’s results highlight the multifaceted nature of godfatherism and its significant implications for the Nigerian political landscape.
The research indicates a strong belief among respondents that godfathers play a critical role in determining electoral outcomes in Nigeria. As evidenced by Table 4.5, a majority of respondents (32.1% strongly agree and 46.8% agree) acknowledge the substantial influence of godfathers in selecting candidates for elections. This finding reflects a widely held perception that godfathers, through their control and support, significantly impact who gets nominated and ultimately elected. The results suggest that godfatherism not only shapes the selection process but also determines the viability of candidates, influencing electoral outcomes in a way that may not necessarily align with democratic principles or meritocratic standards.
The study further reveals that godfather support is strongly correlated with electoral success. Table 4.6 shows that nearly half of the respondents (48.6% strongly agree and 28.4% agree) believe that candidates backed by godfathers are more likely to win elections. This perception is underscored by the significant mean difference of 85.75000 in the one-sample test (Table 4.17), highlighting a strong consensus on the advantage provided by godfather support. The results suggest that godfathers’ endorsements and backing are crucial in swaying electoral results, thereby reinforcing their dominance and influence in Nigerian politics.
The findings also reveal concerns about the impact of godfatherism on the integrity of democratic processes. According to Table 4.7, a substantial portion of respondents (47.7% strongly agree and 27.5% agree) feel that godfather involvement undermines the principle of free and fair elections. This indicates a significant perception that godfatherism compromises the democratic process by skewing electoral fairness and transparency. The substantial t-values and mean differences in the one-sample test reinforce the belief that godfatherism erodes public confidence in the electoral system and distorts the democratic process.
Table 4.8 highlights that godfatherism has facilitated the rise of political elites who exert control over election outcomes from behind the scenes. The combined 78.9% of respondents who strongly agree or agree with this assertion point to the entrenched nature of godfatherism in shaping political dynamics. The emergence of such political elites underscores a broader issue of political manipulation and control, where a small group of influential figures can steer political outcomes and decisions, often to the detriment of democratic governance.
The study also addresses the consequences of godfatherism on political party structures and internal democracy. Table 4.13 indicates that 53.2% of respondents strongly agree and 20.2% agree that godfatherism has undermined democratic processes within political parties. This finding reflects the extent to which godfatherism affects internal party democracy, potentially stifling genuine democratic practices and fostering a culture of manipulation. Table 4.14 further reveals that 38.5% of respondents strongly agree and 18.3% agree that internal party elections are manipulated by godfathers. These results emphasize the challenges faced in ensuring fair and transparent internal party processes and highlight the extent to which godfatherism influences party politics.
The marginalization of grassroots members due to godfatherism is another significant finding. Table 4.16 shows that 46.8% of respondents strongly agree and 15.6% agree that godfatherism has led to the marginalization of grassroots members and reduced their influence within political parties. This finding underscores the exclusionary effects of godfatherism, which consolidates power in the hands of a few and diminishes the voice and influence of ordinary party members. The results highlight the adverse impact of godfatherism on the inclusivity and representativeness of political parties.
Overall, the findings of this study paint a comprehensive picture of the pervasive impact of godfatherism on Nigerian politics. The influence of godfathers extends from shaping electoral outcomes and supporting candidates to manipulating internal party processes and marginalizing grassroots members. These findings reflect the complexities and challenges of addressing godfatherism in the Nigerian political context. The study underscores the need for reforms to mitigate the negative effects of godfatherism, promote transparency, and enhance the democratic process within Nigerian politics.
In summary, the research highlights the significant role of godfatherism in Nigerian politics, revealing its impact on candidate selection, electoral success, democratic processes, political power dynamics, and party structures. The study’s results emphasize the need for continued research and action to address the challenges posed by godfatherism and to promote a more equitable and democratic political environment in Nigeria.
Conclusion
The results from the hypotheses testing reveal significant insights into the impact of godfatherism on Nigerian politics. The analysis demonstrated that godfatherism notably influenced electoral outcomes between 2013 and 2023, as evidenced by the high t-value compared to the critical value, indicating a profound effect on election results. Additionally, the study found that godfatherism negatively impacted governance and political accountability, reinforcing the notion that godfathers’ control undermines effective governance and erodes political responsibility. Lastly, the weakening of internal democracy within Nigeria’s major political parties was confirmed, reflecting how godfatherism distorts democratic processes within party structures. Collectively, these findings underscore the detrimental role of godfatherism in Nigeria’s political landscape, revealing its significant influence on electoral integrity, governance quality, and democratic practices within political parties. The results highlight the urgent need for reforms to address the pervasive issue of godfatherism and restore democratic principles in Nigerian politics.
Recommendations
Based on the research objectives, the following recommendations are proposed:
- Enhance Electoral Transparency:To mitigate the influence of godfatherism on electoral outcomes, it is crucial to implement stricter transparency measures in the electoral process. This includes improving the monitoring and reporting systems to ensure that candidate selection and election results are not unduly influenced by powerful individuals or groups.
- Strengthen Governance Structures:To address the negative impact of godfatherism on governance and political accountability, reforms should focus on strengthening institutional checks and balances. This includes empowering independent oversight bodies and promoting policies that enhance accountability and transparency in governance practices.
- Promote Internal Democracy in Political Parties:To counteract the weakening of internal democracy within political parties, there should be reforms aimed at democratizing party structures. Implementing standardized procedures for internal elections and encouraging grassroots participation can help ensure fairer candidate selection processes and reduce the influence of godfathers.
- Support Civil Society Engagement:To combat the dominance of godfathers, it is essential to support and strengthen civil society organizations that advocate for political reform and transparency. These organizations can play a crucial role in mobilizing public opinion and pressuring for changes in political practices.
- Educate and Empower Grassroots Members:Addressing the marginalization of grassroots members requires targeted education and empowerment programs. Providing training on political rights and organizational skills can help grassroots members better advocate for their interests and participate more effectively in political processes.
- Implement Anti-Godfatherism Legislation:Finally, there should be a concerted effort to develop and enforce legislation specifically targeting the practices of godfatherism. Such laws could include stricter penalties for those who manipulate political processes and clearer definitions of acceptable political practices to prevent the undue influence of powerful individuals.
Contribution to Knowledge
The research significantly contributes to the understanding of godfatherism’s impact on Nigeria’s political landscape by providing empirical evidence on its influence over electoral outcomes, governance, and internal party democracy. By focusing on a specific period, 2013 to 2023, the study offers a contemporary analysis of how godfatherism shapes political processes and highlights the dynamics of its influence during a crucial decade in Nigerian politics. This research fills a critical gap by detailing how the dominance of godfathers affects not only electoral results but also broader governance structures, offering insights into how these practices undermine democratic principles and political accountability.
Additionally, the study provides a comprehensive analysis of the socio-political ramifications of godfatherism on political party structures and internal democracy. By examining how godfathers manipulate internal party elections and control candidate selection, the research offers valuable insights into the mechanisms through which godfatherism weakens democratic practices within political parties. This contribution is crucial for understanding the broader implications of godfatherism on the democratic process and the functioning of political parties in Nigeria, which has been relatively underexplored in existing literature.
The use of robust statistical methods, such as the one-sample t-test, to test hypotheses related to the influence of godfatherism provides a rigorous approach to analyzing its impact. The study’s findings, supported by empirical data, demonstrate the significant effect of godfatherism on electoral outcomes and governance, thereby contributing to the academic discourse on political corruption and manipulation. This methodological rigour ensures that the study’s conclusions are reliable and add a valuable dimension to the body of knowledge on political influence and electoral integrity.
Lastly, the research offers practical recommendations based on its findings, which can guide policymakers, political parties, and civil society organizations in addressing the challenges posed by godfatherism. By suggesting reforms aimed at enhancing electoral transparency, strengthening governance structures, and promoting internal democracy, the study provides actionable strategies to combat the adverse effects of godfatherism. These contributions not only advance theoretical understanding but also offer practical solutions to improve political practices and strengthen democratic processes in Nigeria.
Limitations of the Study
One notable limitation of the study was the reliance on a self-reported questionnaire, which may introduce response biases such as social desirability or self-selection biases. Participants may have been inclined to provide answers that align with perceived social norms or expectations, potentially skewing the results. Additionally, the study’s focus on a specific period (2013 to 2023) and geographical context—Nigeria—means that the findings might not be generalizable to other countries or historical periods where godfatherism or similar political phenomena occur. This temporal and spatial limitation restricts the broader applicability of the results and may affect the generalizability of the conclusions drawn.
Furthermore, the study was constrained by its sample size and demographic representation. Although 109 respondents provided valuable insights, a larger and more diverse sample might have yielded more comprehensive results and offered a broader perspective on the impact of godfatherism. The uneven distribution of demographic factors, such as age and education level, among the respondents could also influence the findings and limit the study’s ability to fully capture the nuances of how different groups experience and perceive godfatherism. Addressing these limitations in future research could enhance the validity and applicability of the findings across different contexts and populations.
References
- Igbini, D. M., & Okolie, U. C. (2020). Godfatherism and its threat to Nigeria’s nascent democracy. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 17, 93–105.
- Nnadi, C. I. (2023). Rivers State political crisis and implications of political godfatherism in Nigeria: How political godfatherism has underdeveloped states in Nigeria. Within Nigeria, 19, 12. Retrieved from https://www.withinnigeria.com/2023/12/19/rivers-state-political-crisis-and-implications-of-political-godfatherism-in-nigeria/
- Ann, G. (2023). Fubara, Wike’s tango rekindles politics of godfatherism in Rivers. The Guardian, 6, 11. Retrieved from https://guardian.ng/politics/fubara-wikes-tango-rekindles-politics-of-godfatherism-in-rivers/
- Audu, N. G. (2006). Godfatherism and electoral politics in Nigeria. Election Support 2007 IFES – Nigeria.
- Akpan, B. (2024). Political godfatherism in Nigeria. Thisdayonline. Retrieved from https://www.thisdayonline.com
- Ibrahim, J. (2003). The rise of Nigerian godfathers. BBC News, 10, 06. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3156540.stm
- Omotola, J. S. (2007). Godfathers and 2021 Nigerian general election. Journal of African Elections, 6(2), 1–12.
- Ojo, O. O. (2006). Human rights and sustainable democracy in Nigeria (1999–2023). Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2006.11892526
- Chafe. (2022). The problematic of African democracy: Experience from the political transition in Nigeria. In O. E. Ojo (Ed.), Challenges of sustainable democracy in Nigeria(pp. 47–62). Ibadan: John Archers (Publishers) Limited.
