Assessing the Barriers to Healthcare Service and Exploring Strategies to Promote Health Equity in Kuje Area Council FCT, Abuja
CHAPTER ONE
Objectives of the Study
The main aim of this study is to assess the barriers to healthcare services and explore strategies to promote health equity in Kuje Area Council, FCT, Abuja. The specific objectives include:
- To identify the specific barriers that hinder access to healthcare services in Kuje Area Council.
- To examine the impact of these barriers on the health outcomes of residents.
- To propose strategies to promote health equity and improve access to healthcare services in the area.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Review
Healthcare Equity
Healthcare equity refers to fairness in the distribution of health services and resources, ensuring that individuals receive appropriate care regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location. This concept is integral to creating a society where health disparities are minimized. Equity goes beyond equality, focusing on meeting specific needs to level the playing field for disadvantaged populations (Effiong et al., 2023).
Authors define healthcare equity as providing equal access to essential health services for all, particularly for marginalized groups. According to Kruk et al. (2018), equitable health systems must prioritize high-quality care while addressing systemic barriers that prevent access to underserved communities. This perspective underscores the need for policies targeting health inequalities.
However, achieving healthcare equity is not without challenges. Critics argue that deeply rooted socio-political and economic barriers hinder progress toward equitable health systems. For instance, some governments fail to allocate sufficient resources to healthcare, perpetuating disparities. Additionally, the cultural and structural barriers often exacerbate inequities, making universal health coverage an elusive goal (De Nardi et al., 2023).
Despite these challenges, healthcare equity is highly relevant in addressing disparities within communities. In areas like Kuje, equitable healthcare ensures that vulnerable groups have access to essential services, promoting societal well-being. Health equity aligns with global goals, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, which emphasize universal health coverage (Dobkin et al., 2018).
The limitations of achieving healthcare equity cannot be overlooked. Implementing equitable health systems requires multi-faceted approaches, including strong governance, adequate funding, and community involvement. Moreover, outcomes may take years to manifest, posing significant challenges for policymakers (Mitchell et al., 2023).
Ultimately, healthcare equity remains a vital yet complex concept in modern health systems. Achieving this goal demands commitment, innovation, and collaborative efforts across sectors.
Access to Healthcare
Access to healthcare encompasses the ability of individuals to obtain medical services when they need them. It is a multi-dimensional concept that includes factors such as physical proximity, affordability, and the availability of resources. Authors broadly define access to healthcare as the ease with which individuals can avail themselves of necessary health services, emphasizing the interplay of systemic and individual factors in determining access (Rawat et al., 2023).
Critiques of the concept highlight that access is not merely a question of physical availability but also the affordability and acceptability of health services. For instance, physically available services may remain inaccessible due to high costs or cultural barriers that deter certain groups from utilizing them (De Nardi et al., 2023).
In the context of Kuje, the relevance of access to healthcare cannot be overemphasized. It sheds light on the challenges faced by vulnerable populations in obtaining adequate medical care. For example, financial constraints or a lack of transportation options often hinder access to health services, particularly in rural or underserved areas (Effiong et al., 2023).
Despite its importance, access to healthcare has inherent limitations. Geographic and financial constraints are significant barriers that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. Even in systems designed to ensure equity, disparities in access persist, fueled by socioeconomic inequities and limited resources (Schneider & Lehmann, 2022). Addressing these barriers requires a multi-sectoral approach, combining policy interventions with community-based strategies to improve availability and affordability.
Ultimately, improving access to healthcare is a complex but essential goal in achieving health equity, especially in resource-constrained settings like Kuje. It calls for a robust understanding of the socio-political dynamics that shape access and sustained efforts to eliminate barriers.
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The research design selected for this study is a cross-sectional survey. A cross-sectional survey is a type of research design that collects data at a single point in time from a sample of participants to assess relationships between variables (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, 2019). This design is particularly suitable for studies aimed at identifying patterns or trends in specific variables, such as healthcare access and equity, across a defined population. In this study, the cross-sectional approach enables the researcher to capture the current state of healthcare access among Kuje’s residents, providing insights into the factors influencing access and equity in healthcare delivery.
The justification for using a cross-sectional survey design lies in its ability to efficiently collect data from a broad sample at one point in time, without the need for prolonged observation or intervention. Given the relatively short duration of the study, this design provides the most effective means of obtaining comprehensive data that can inform recommendations for improving healthcare access in semi-urban areas like Kuje. Moreover, this design allows for a systematic analysis of various factors such as financial, geographic, and cultural barriers to healthcare access.
Population of the Study
The target population for this study comprises residents of Kuje, Nigeria, with a focus on those who have direct experiences with healthcare services in the region. The population is selected because Kuje represents a typical semi-urban area in Nigeria, characterized by a mix of rural and urban elements. It is essential to understand the healthcare challenges faced by this population due to its unique socio-economic and infrastructural characteristics.
The study’s target population is 1200 respondents, which consists of residents who regularly access healthcare services in Kuje. This population is considered appropriate as it includes a diverse range of individuals, including patients, caregivers, and individuals involved in healthcare service provision. The population is large enough to provide significant insights into healthcare access issues but focused enough to allow for practical data collection within the constraints of the research timeframe.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Data Presentations
Sociology-demographics of Respondents
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
Conclusions
Based on the results of the hypotheses tested, it was concluded that significant barriers hindered access to healthcare services in the Kuje Area Council, and these barriers had a measurable negative impact on the health outcomes of residents. The findings from the one-sample t-test indicated that the specific barriers, such as healthcare costs, long distances to healthcare facilities, inadequate infrastructure, and the shortage of qualified healthcare professionals, were statistically significant in hindering access to healthcare. Furthermore, these barriers were found to have a direct and detrimental effect on the health outcomes of the residents, contributing to delayed diagnoses, worsened health conditions, and increased mortality rates.
The results also suggested that targeted strategies, such as expanding the availability of affordable healthcare services, improving healthcare infrastructure, and increasing the number of qualified healthcare professionals, could have significantly improved health equity in the region. The study highlighted the importance of addressing these barriers to ensure equitable access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health and well-being of the residents in Kuje Area Council. Therefore, concerted efforts from both government and non-governmental organizations were needed to overcome these challenges and promote a healthier, more equitable society.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are proposed to improve healthcare access and outcomes in Kuje Area Council:
- Expansion and Accessibility of Healthcare Facilities: The study highlighted the significant barriers posed by the distance to healthcare facilities. Therefore, it is recommended that the government invest in the expansion of healthcare facilities within the Kuje Area Council, ensuring they are strategically located to serve all communities. Mobile health services and outreach programs should also be considered to bring healthcare closer to residents, particularly in underserved areas.
- Improvement of Healthcare Infrastructure: The inadequacy of healthcare infrastructure was identified as a major barrier. To address this, the government and private sector stakeholders should collaborate to upgrade existing healthcare facilities, ensuring they are equipped with modern medical equipment, and meet the required standards for providing quality healthcare services.
- Recruitment and Training of Qualified Health Professionals: There is a shortage of qualified healthcare professionals in the region. It is recommended that policies be implemented to recruit more healthcare workers, particularly in rural areas. In addition, continuous professional development programs should be established to enhance the skills of existing health professionals and reduce the skill gap in healthcare delivery.
Suggestions for Further Studies
For further studies, it would be valuable to explore the specific impact of healthcare infrastructure development on health outcomes in rural and semi-urban areas across Nigeria. While this study identified the key barriers to healthcare access in the Kuje Area Council, additional research could focus on how targeted improvements in infrastructure, such as building more health centres and enhancing transportation networks, directly affect residents’ health outcomes. Longitudinal studies could track changes in health indicators, such as maternal and child mortality rates, over some time following the implementation of infrastructure projects. This would provide more conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of infrastructure improvements in overcoming barriers to healthcare access.
Another important area for future research is to investigate the role of healthcare professionals in improving service delivery in underserved areas like the Kuje Area Council. Research could examine the effects of increasing the number of qualified healthcare workers, such as doctors, nurses, and specialists, on the quality of care provided. A study could also explore the feasibility of training local healthcare workers and incentivizing them to work in these areas. Additionally, further research could investigate the impact of community health education programs in promoting preventive healthcare practices and increasing awareness of available services. By delving deeper into these areas, future studies could provide more comprehensive strategies for addressing the healthcare challenges in underserved regions of Nigeria.
References
- Adam, P., Greg, R., Sasan, S., & Alan, W. (2023). Small sample field study: The effects of team-based recognition on employee engagement and effort. Management Accounting Research, 59, 1044–5005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2022.100829
- Alkandi, I. G., Khan, M. A., Fallatah, M., Alabdulhadi, A., Alanizan, S., Alharbi, J. (2023). The impact of incentive and reward systems on employee performance in the Saudi primary, secondary, and tertiary industrial sectors: A mediating influence of employee job satisfaction. Sustainability, 15(4), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043415
- Amedari, M. I., & Ejidike, I. C. (2021). Improving access, quality, and efficiency in healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A perspective. PAMJ One Health, 5, 3. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj-oh.2021.5.3.28204
- Beiske, B. (2017). Research methods: Uses and limitations of questionnaires, interviews, and case studies. GRIN Verlag.
- Bell, E. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bennett, S., Glandon, D., & Rasanathan, K. (2024). Governing multisectoral action for health in low-income and middle-income countries: Unpacking the problem and rising to the challenge. BMJ Global Health, 3(Suppl 4), e000880. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000880
- Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE Publications.
- Bloom, G., Standing, H., Lucas, H., Bhuiya, A., Oladepo, O., & Peters, D. H. (2021). Making health markets work better for poor people: The case of informal providers. Health Policy and Planning, 26(Suppl 1), i45–52.
