Evaluation of Sustainable Maritime Transport System in an Emerging Economy (a Case Study of Delta State)
CHAPTER ONE
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The objectives of the study are;
- To ascertain the relationship between maritime transport system and emerging economy
- To ascertain the relationship between environmental integration of social concerns and emerging economy
- To ascertain the impact of sustainability in the maritime transport sector
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Sustainability Issues in Shipping, Port and Maritime Logistics
The eight choice papers for this Special Issue have been collected from open invitation through the Sustainability journal website and two international conferences: The 1st international conference on Yangtze-River Research Innovation and Belt, held in Ocean College, Zhejiang University in Zhoushan City, China on 2–5 December 2018 and the 3rd International Conference on the Belt and Road Initiative in association with the Asian Logistics Round Table, held in Vietnam RMIT University in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam on 24–26 June 2018. Shin et al. (Contribution 1) conducted a comprehensive literature review of sustainability published in maritime-related journals between 1993 and 2017, applying a generative probabilistic text-mining technique, called latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) [26]. The journals cover transportation, logistics, shipping, and port-related topics and are listed on the science citation index (SCI), science citation index expanded (SCIE) and social science citation index (SSCI). A total of 155 papers were collected for the study. LDA can capture topics on shipping, port, maritime logistics issues in sustainability in terms of keywords frequency, their betweenness centrality, their network for co-occurrence of the papers, and co-authorship by country, affiliation, and collaboration between authors, respectively. One interesting result in this paper is that there are 18 high-frequency keywords above five occurrences which are related to maritime sustainability. Leaving aside sustainability, the term “management” has the highest occurrences, followed by “port,” “emission,” “impact,” and “performance.” For the shipping and port sector, these issues are related to green ports/shipping, carbon emission/climate change and region-specific environmental regulation/management. For the maritime logistics sector, sustainability issues are generally related to achieving optimal logistics systems, sustainable supply chain design, and service quality management. Another interesting test result shows that, recently, the keywords in sustainability studies in maritime transport and logistics have considered governance, corporate social responsibility, and supply chain management. Therefore, it can be said that this paper contributes to figuring out research trends and research networks in sustainability in maritime transport and logistics over the last 25 years using a solid technique, LDA. Having considered both trade-off analysis and environmental policy intervention analysis, Dai et al.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research design
The researcher used descriptive research survey design in building up this project work the choice of this research design was considered appropriate because of its advantages of identifying attributes of a large population from a group of individuals. The design was suitable for the study as the study sought evaluation of Sustainable Maritime Transport System in an Emerging Economy.
CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION ANALYSIS INTERPRETATION OF DATA
Introduction
Efforts will be made at this stage to present, analyze and interpret the data collected during the field survey. This presentation will be based on the responses from the completed questionnaires. The result of this exercise will be summarized in tabular forms for easy references and analysis. It will also show answers to questions relating to the research questions for this research study. The researcher employed simple percentage in the analysis.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Introduction
It is important to ascertain that the objective of this study was to ascertain Evaluation of Sustainable Maritime Transport System in an Emerging Economy
In the preceding chapter, the relevant data collected for this study were presented, critically analyzed and appropriate interpretation given. In this chapter, certain recommendations made which in the opinion of the researcher will be of benefits in addressing the challenges of Sustainable Maritime Transport System In An Emerging Economy
Summary
This study was on Evaluation of Sustainable Maritime Transport System In An Emerging Economy. Three objectives were raised which included: To ascertain the relationship between maritime transport system and emerging economy, to ascertain the relationship between environmental integration of social concerns and emerging economy and to ascertain the impact of sustainability in the maritime transport sector. In line with these objectives, two research hypotheses were formulated and two null hypotheses were posited. The total population for the study is 200 staff maritime transport sector, Delta state. The researcher used questionnaires as the instrument for the data collection. Descriptive Survey research design was adopted for this study. A total of 133 respondents made up technical managers, HRM, senior staff and junior staff were used for the study. The data collected were presented in tables and analyzed using simple percentages and frequencies
Conclusion
This paper introduces sustainable maritime transport in an emerging economy which is based on the initial principles of sustainable development. The next step of work in this context will be the development of a framework of indicators for assessing the sustainability of maritime transport.
Recommendation
Government should address the specific challenges in maritime sector, enabling them to reorient their policy based on objective measurement, and to assess progress towards chosen sustainability goals.
REFERENCES
- Beatley T. 1995. The Many Meanings of Sustainability, Jour-nal of Planning Literature, Vol. 9, No. 4, May, 1995, pp. 339-342.
- Black, J. A., Paez, A., and Suthanaya, P.A. 2002. Sustainable Urban Transportation: Performance Indicators and Some Analytical Approaches. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 128, No. 4, 184-209.
- Bruntland, G. 1987. Our common future: The World Commis-sion on Environment and Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Buhaug, Ø. et al. 2009. Second IMO GHG Study 2009, Inter-national Maritime Organization (IMO), London, UK.
- Cabezas-Basurko, O., Mesbahi, E., Moloney, S. R. 2008. Methodology for sustainability analysis of ships, Ships and Offshore Structures,3:1,1 — 11
- Carvalho, J. F. 2011. Measuring economic performance, social progress and sustainability using an index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1073–1079.
- Chatzinikolaou, S., Ventikos, N.P., Nitsopoulos, S., 2007. Shipboard Wastes: Elements & Critical Review. Proceed-ings of the 1st CEMEPE/SECOTOX Conference, June 24 – 28, 2007, Skiathos Island, Greece.
- Corbett, J. J., J. J. Winebrake, E. H. Green, P. Kasibhatla, V. Eyring, and A. Lauer (2007), Mortality from ship emis-sions: A global assessment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(24), 8512– 8518, doi:10.1021/es071686z.
- Dahlsrud, A., 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility and Envi-ronmental Management Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt. 15, 1–13 (2008) in Wiley Inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/csr.132 Dally.
- H.E. 2006. Sustainable Development: Definitions, Prin-ciples, Policies. The Future of Sustainability 2006, Part 1, 39-53, DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4908-0_2
